The main result of this assignment is a report containing the following closely interrelated components:
I. Technical Evaluation:
The technical evaluation of the national and sub-national demonstration activities in the PACC Project will cover the following aspects:
a) Examine the extent to which the design of the overall PACC project allows for appropriate assessment of vulnerability and adaptation capacity and needs prior to the selection and implementation of specific adaptation-centred policies and measures and provide operationally viable recommendations for financing the requisite assessments with resources from the project budget;
b) Evaluation of the methodology that is (or to be) applied for the vulnerability assessment including extent to which :
- Climate change information was (will be) integrated in the selection of any proposed policies and measures prior to their actual implementation.
- Efforts were made to analyse the underlying causes of vulnerability (both climate change related as well as those that are not climate change related including natural disasters, resources management, location, agricultural practices, capacity issues, etc)
- Any assessments differentiated vulnerability by area, individuals or population groups, by temporal horizon (short-, medium- and long-term horizon), etc .
- Criteria used to identify priorities for policy formulation and/or measures in the context of emerging climate change risks.
- Assess the extent to which the community demonstration activities have been used to inform the policy mainstreaming processes pursued under Outcome 1 of the project, and vice-versa, to what extent the policy and planning frameworks revised or being revised served to support the community demonstration activities.
c) Assessment of policies and measures that were selected for implementation. Following the conclusion of vulnerability assessments, ideally, a set of potential policies and measures would have emerged for implementation. The technical assessment will examine the extent to which the selection of the most appropriate option was motivated by:
- Capacity of the option to decrease vulnerability in a specific sector and increase the resilience of an area and population group
- Synergy of the policy or measure with general development strategies
- Socio-economic/vulnerability analysis related to the implementation of the policies and measures
- Comparative cost-benefit analysis including a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Technical assessment/feasibility of the adaptation option
- Environmental Impact Assessment
d) Assess to what extent the results of the demonstration activities have been communicated to national stakeholders (both community level and upwards national level)
e) Assess how the implementation of the demonstration activities (or will) incorporate cross-cutting issues such as gender.
f) To the extent possible, assess the benefits of the policies and measures in place or likely to be in place as a result of the UNDP/GEF project. The evaluation will provide an analysis of the observable changes and benefits to communities derived from the implementation of the adaptation policies and measures.
g) Capacity of national and community institutions to sustain the project results in the long term
h) Lessons learned; what has worked or not and the lessons learned at community consultation and engagement level, institutional arrangements and technical assessments (V&A etc.) level.
i) Recommendations to further improve the demonstration activities
II. Draft technical guide documenting the demonstration activities and experience to date
a) Attached to the technical evaluation, assess to what extent the assessment, planning and implementation process associated with the demonstration activities have been systematically documented by project teams including SPREP.
b) Analyse information and documentation gaps in the demonstration activities process and make recommendations to overcome
c) In coordination with the national Coordinators and their team, compile and draft a technical guide documenting the process of formulating and implementing demonstration activities and experience to date, along the main steps (community consultations, assessment, planning design, and implementation), follow a generic outline, to be adjusted to the national and local circumstances.
The guides will be further completed by the national teams with the support from SPREP during the remaining duration of the projects, incorporating the experience from the full implementation of adaptation measures and completion of the demonstration activities.
III. Plan for up-scaling and replication of the demonstration activities experience that can be implemented through additional funds
a) Provide an assessment on the impact of additional resources on the management of PACC with regards to administration and implementation of up-scaling demonstration activities
b) Identify replication and up-scaling opportunities to extend the experiences of the ongoing demonstration activities in the pilot communities to additional areas and communities in the respective PACC project focus sectors (water, agriculture or coastal). An alternative option is to implement complementary measures in the current PACC target communities.
c) Draw up a replication and up-scaling plan, including the definition of the additional communities/areas, climate-change related issues to be addressed, adaptation measures to be implemented, with a budgeted work-plan for the period January 2012 – April 2014.
|