This Final Evaluation is initiated by the UNDP Romania as the Implementation Agency for this project and it aims to provide managers (at the Project Implementation Unit, UNDP Romania Country Office and UNDP/GEF levels) with a comprehensive overall assessment of the project and an opportunity to critically assess administrative and technical strategies, issues and constrains associated with large international and multi-partner initiatives. The purpose of the Evaluation is: - To assess overall performance against the Project objectives as set out in Project Document and other related documents To assess the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of the Project
- To critically analyze the implementation, management and evaluation arrangements of the Project
- To assess the sustainability of the Project’s outcomes
- To assess the catalytic or replication effect of the project
- To assess the processes that affected the attainment of the project results
- To present lessons and recommendations on all relevant aspects of the project
Project performance will be measured based on Project’s Logical Framework, which provides clear performance and impact indicators for project implementation along with their corresponding means of verification. The Report of the Final Evaluation will be stand-alone document that substantiates its recommendations and conclusions. Expected deliverables - Short strategy and approach of the assignment (max 5 pages), upon the desk review of relevant project documents, to be delivered prior to the in-country mission
- Draft evaluation report, after the in-country mission
- Final evaluation report, after the incorporation of stakeholders comments
The Final Evaluation Report should be structured along the following lines: 1. Executive summary 2. Introduction 3. The project(s) and its development context 4. Findings and Conclusions Project formulation Implementation Project Finances Results
5, Recommendations 6. Lessons learned 7. Annexes The length of report normally should not exceed 50 pages in total. The draft report will be submitted to UNDP/GEF no later than July 20th, 2009. Based on the feedback received from stakeholders a final report will be prepared by August 15th, 2008. The report will be submitted both electronically and in printed version, in English. The report will be supplemented by Rating Tables (see Annex III).
Tentative timeframe (Estimated consultancy time = 25 work-days) Briefing of the evaluator and desk review, followed by submission of the short strategy and approach of the assignment (home-based work) = 25 May – 14 June 5 days mission to Romania, with a trip to the project site, interviews with stakeholders, questionnaires; 15-20 June Preparation of the draft evaluation report = 21 June – 15 July Validation of preliminary findings with stakeholders through circulation of the draft evaluation report for comments, (home-based work) = 15 July – 20 July Preparation of final report (home-based-work) = 20 July– 15 August
Special requirements The evaluation will be undertaken in-line with GEF principles: - Independence
- Impartiality
- Transparency
- Disclosure
- Ethical
- Partnership
- Competencies and Capacities
- Credibility
- Utility
The evaluator must be independent from both the policy-making process and the delivery and management of assistance. Therefore applications will not be considered from evaluators who have had any direct involvement with the design or implementation of the project. This may apply equally to evaluators who are associated with organizations, universities or entities that are, or have been, involved in the MMNP policy-making process and/or delivery of the project. Any previous association with the project, the MMNP Administration, the National Forestry Administration, or other partners/stakeholders must be disclosed in the application. If selected, failure to make the above disclosures will be considered just grounds for immediate contract termination, without recompense. In such circumstances, all notes, reports and other documentation produced by the evaluator will be retained by UNDP. |