<< Back

This job listing is no longer active.
Please use our Environment Jobs Search to find current vacancies.

Title

Individual Consultant: Team Leader for Project Final Evaluation

Posted
Reference   (Please mention Stopdodo/Environment Jobs in your application)
Sectors Terrestrial / Aquatic Ecology & Conservation
Sustainability, Climate, CSR, EMS
Location Georgia - Europe
Type Temporary / Contract / Seasonal
Status Full Time
Level Mid Level
Deadline 15/07/2011
Company Name United Nations Development Program
Contact Name Human Resources
Website Further Details / Applications
United Nations Development Program logo
Directory Entry : UNDP is the UN's global development network, an organization advocating for change and connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life. We are on the ground in 166 countries, working with them on their own solutions to global and national development challenges. For environmental jobs with UNDP visit their website. Or for more environmental jobs search environmentjobs.com
Also Listing:
Description
The Monitoring and Evaluation Policy at the project level in UNDP/GEF has four objectives: i) to monitor and evaluate results and impacts; ii) to provide a basis for decision making on necessary amendments and improvements; iii) to promote accountability for resource use; and iv) to document, provide feedback on, and disseminate lessons learned.
The final evaluation is intended to assess the relevance, performance and success of the project. It looks at early sign of potential impact and sustainability of results, including the contribution to capacity development and the achievement of global environmental goals. It will also identify/document lessons learned and make recommendations that might improve design and implementation of the national policy as a follow-up to the UNDP/GEF project initiatives.
 
The evaluation is to be undertaken in accordance with the “GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy”(see http://thegef.org/MonitoringandEvaluation/MEPoliciesProcedures/mepoliciesprocedures.html).
 
Evaluations in the GEF explore five major criteria:
  • Relevance – the extent to which the activity is suited to local and national development priorities and organizational policies, including changes over time.
  • Effectiveness – the extent to which an objective has been achieved or how likely it is to be achieved.
  • Efficiency – the extent to which results have been delivered with the least costly resources possible.
  • Results – the positive and negative, and foreseen and unforeseen, changes to and effects produced by a development intervention. In GEF terms, results include direct project outputs, short-to medium term outcomes, and longer-term impact including global environmental benefits, replication effects and other, local effects.
  • Sustainability – the likely ability of an intervention to continue to deliver benefits for an extended period of time after completion. Projects need to be environmentally as well as financially and socially sustainable.

 

Duties and Responsibilities

  • Lead and manage the evaluation mission
  • Design the detailed evaluation scope and methodology (including the methods for data collection and analysis)
  • Decide the division of labor within the evaluation team
  • Conduct an analysis of the outcome, outputs and partnership strategy (as per the scope of the evaluation described above)
  • Draft related parts of the evaluation report
  • Finalize the whole evaluation report.
The key product expected from this final evaluation is a comprehensive analytical report in English that should, at least, include the following contents:
 
Please note that some of the categories in the findings and conclusions need to be rated in conformity with the GEF guidelines for final evaluations.
 
Executive summary
  • Brief description of project
  • Context and purpose of the evaluation
  • Main conclusions, recommendations and lessons learned
Introduction
  • Purpose of the evaluation
  • Key issues addressed
  • Methodology of the evaluation
  • Structure of the evaluation
The project(s) and its development context
  • Project start and its duration
  • Problems that the project seek to address
  • Immediate and development objectives of the project
  • Main stakeholders
  • Results expected
Findings and Conclusions
  
Documents to be submitted with proposal:
 
Interested individual consultants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications:
 
Financial Proposal
 
The financial proposal will specify the daily fee, travel expenses and per diems quoted in separate line items, and payments are made to the Individual Consultant based on the number of days worked.
 
Travel
 
All envisaged travel costs must be included in the financial proposal. This includes all travel to join duty station/repatriation travel. In general, UNDP should not accept travel costs exceeding those of an economy class ticket. Should the IC wish to travel on a higher class he/she should do so using their own resources.
 
In the case of unforeseeable travel, payment of travel costs including tickets, lodging and terminal expenses should be agreed upon, between the respective business unit and Individual Consultant, prior to travel and will be reimbursed.
 
Evaluation
 
Individual consultants will be evaluated based on the Cumulative analysis (detailed information is given in the ANNEX 1):
2. Cumulative analysis
UNDP applies the ‘Best value for money’ approach - the final selection will be based on the combination of the applicants’ qualifications and financial proposal. Maximum obtainable score is 100, out of which the total score for technical criteria equals to 70 and for financial criteria – to 30.
Total for technical qualification: 50 points. Candidates who will obtain 70% or more out of maximum obtainable (i.e. 50 x 70% = 35) points will be considered as qualified
Interviewing of the short-listed candidates.
Up to top 5 qualified applicants will be short-listed and interviewed. Maximum obtainable for interview for National Consultant: 20 points
Evaluation of financial proposals and cumulative evaluation
A maximum of 30 points will be assigned to the lowest price offer. All other price offers will receive points in inverse proportion, using the formula: Financial score offer X = 30 x (lowest price/ price offer X).
Applicant with maximum combined scores calculated as (Scores technical qualification + Scores interview + Scores financial proposal ) will be granted a contract.
 

 

Competencies

  • Strong analytical skills
  • Excellent communications and writing skills
  • Excellent team working skills

 

Required Skills and Experience

  • Master’s or higher university degree in energy, natural resource management, environmental economics or other related fields
  • Experience in evaluating energy programmes for UN or other international development agencies;
  • Experience in RE in particular, small hydropower and/or geothermal resources project development and/or evaluation
  • Proved knowledge and experience in GEF M&E guidelines and procedures
  • Competence in Adaptive Management, as applied to GEF RE and/or natural resource management projects
  • Knowledge of working in the Europe and CIS region and in particular Georgia is preferred but not required
Add to My Account
<< Back