The Reclassification and Effective Management of the National Protected Areas System Project’s main purpose is to strengthen the enabling frameworks and capacities for managing the National Protected Area System. The intervention will put in place appropriate policy, regulatory and governance frameworks in order to provide new tools for public/community/private/civil society management partnerships. It also aims at strengthening the existing institutional capacities for improved Protected Areas representation, monitoring and evaluation and business and investment planning. The Reclassification and Effective Management of the National Protected Areas System Project has received a grant from the German Government for the management of the West Lunga National Park and the surrounding areas. The Project at the West Lunga Demonstration Site aims to: i) create new protected area categories in the surrounding areas on customary land around West Lunga National Park that would be able to effectively conserve biodiversity; ii) establish a public-private-community partnership for the management of the entire area, and iii) establish innovative funding mechanisms to support the management of the entire area as well as assist in the development of the local community in the area. The project will ensure that a large area of forest in Zambia is prevented from deforestation and restored to its natural functions and biomass content if effectively managed. Deforestation and forest degradation are the second leading cause of global warming, responsible for about 20% of global greenhouse emissions, which makes the loss and depletion of forests an important issue for climate change. Eighty percent of Earth’s above-ground terrestrial carbon and 40% of below-ground terrestrial carbon is stored in forests. Hence, combating deforestation and degradation has been identified as one of the most effective ways to lower emissions. Any reduction in the rate of deforestation and degradation has the benefit of avoiding a significant source of carbon emissions and reducing other environmental and social problems associated with deforestation. Unlike afforestation and reforestation activities, which generally cause small annual changes in carbon stocks over long periods of time, deforestation can cause large changes in carbon stocks over a short period of time. Most emissions from deforestation are released into the atmosphere rapidly, whereas carbon removal from afforestation and reforestation is a slow process. The concept of “Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries” (REDD) is currently being developed. The basic idea of REDD is that developing countries willing and able to reduce their deforestation rate keyed to a reference period will receive financial incentives or support. The transfers will be based on foregone opportunity costs or on the value of carbon market prices. Another potential area of environmental finance is the voluntary carbon market. The voluntary carbon market is based around the idea of companies and individuals providing finance to “offset” (compensate for) emissions associated with their commercial activities or products. This market is currently estimated at approximately $80 million per year and is expanding and changing rapidly (growth of 50 to 100% per year). A major constraint to successful forestry-based carbon offset programs and potential funding from the REDD programme and the Voluntary Carbon Market is the lack of reliable, accurate and cost-effective methods for monitoring carbon storage. If carbon becomes an internationally-traded commodity, as it appears likely, then monitoring the amount of carbon fixed by projects will become a critical component of any trading system. Carbon inventories over time record changes in the quantities of carbon fixed due to a specific project’s activities. The inventory process usually yields two types of outputs: baseline reports that describe carbon pool sizes at the beginning of the project and periodic reports that describe changes in these pools based on repeated measurement. The initial baseline carbon report provides an estimate of the quantity and distribution of carbon in vegetation and soils. This baseline should be produced before project activities begin and would serve as a benchmark from which future changes in carbon pool size would be calculated. Periodic inventory reports provide the basis for determining changes in carbon pools. Quantifying changes in non-project (reference case) vegetation is, in most cases, essential for quantifying a project’s net carbon accumulation. Non-project vegetation will most likely change during the project period, so that the only way to quantify projects benefits reliably is to monitor vegetation on both project and non-project sites and calculate the difference in carbon stored. The following consultancy will lead to the development of a methodology for periodic carbon monitoring resulting in the estimation of carbon sequestration as a result of the project, a baseline estimate of current project and non-project carbon storage as well as information on potential sources of carbon finance and suggested ways of sharing the benefits between stakeholders. |